<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RPM Transaction Enhancements</title>
	<link>http://www.snorp.net/log/2007/05/04/rpm-transaction-enhancements/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://www.snorp.net/log/2007/05/04/rpm-transaction-enhancements/#comment-29015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.snorp.net/log/2007/05/04/rpm-transaction-enhancements/#comment-29015</guid>
		<description>Not to sound rude, but rpm wasn't designed to support "atomic transactions" or rollbacks. Conary is a package manager written by the same guy who originally wrote RPM. It supports all of the features he didn't put in RPM like atomic transactions and rollbacks.

Take a look at what they do with rpath. FYI: I am not affiliated with or working for rpath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to sound rude, but rpm wasn&#8217;t designed to support &#8220;atomic transactions&#8221; or rollbacks. Conary is a package manager written by the same guy who originally wrote RPM. It supports all of the features he didn&#8217;t put in RPM like atomic transactions and rollbacks.</p>
<p>Take a look at what they do with rpath. FYI: I am not affiliated with or working for rpath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
